Previously Martin Aspeli wrote: > Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > >Right now we have one solution: skin layers. Until the new stuff is used > >that is what people should be using. Consistent, flexible, and well > >documented. > > For the record, I disagree with this (and so does my book). > > I think browse views are vastly superior to skin layer templates, > because they give you a sensible place to put view logic. Last I > checked, they do cache in CacheFu as well.
Browser views do cache. Browser resources do not. > Style sheets and images don't, and people may prefer skin layers. Style sheets often want DTML, which is not supported in browser resources. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
