On May 19, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Right now we have one solution: skin layers. Until the new stuff
is used
that is what people should be using. Consistent, flexible, and well
documented.
For the record, I disagree with this (and so does my book).
I think browse views are vastly superior to skin layer templates,
because they give you a sensible place to put view logic. Last I
checked, they do cache in CacheFu as well.
Browser views do cache. Browser resources do not.
True that. I wonder how hard it'd be to fix, since we fixed it for
views?
Depends on what you mean by "cache". I don't believe CacheFu provides
"in-memory" caching of either browser views or browser resources
although it can attach cache control headers to browser views to
moderate the caching behavior downstream of the server (in proxies or
the browser).
See
http://www.openplans.org/projects/cachefu/lists/cachefu-dev/archive/2008/04/1209370823611
Ric
_______________________________________________
Product-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
