On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 16:09 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > On 7/9/10 16:05 , Johannes Raggam wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 15:45 +0200, Roel Bruggink wrote: > > > > > >> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Johannes Raggam<[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> * to start over, i gonna rename the package > >> collective.wpaudioplayer to > >> collective.js.wpaudioplayer which i put in SVN yesterday > >> (since > > > >> Why would you use collective.js, if the player is swf? > > > > i meant collective.lib.wpaudioplayer here ... > > If we use js for javascript, why not use swf for flash? .lib is > extremely generic and provides no hint that you use it for flash. hmm. thats a point i also thought about. but i thought c.swf.* would be too specific because i guess there are libraries out there which cant be classified easily. for example if one uses much swf but provides js fallback mechanism and so on...
...hannes > > Wichert. > _______________________________________________ > Product-Developers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
