On 07/09/2010 04:32 PM, Roel Bruggink wrote: > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Johannes Raggam > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > why i came up with this idea is because > - i started to like the collective.js.* namespace and > - the namespace collective.flowplayer is taken. since i want to create a > new and simpler flowplayer integration package, i need a sounding name > for it. > > > If collective.flowplayer already exists, why don't you try to simplify > that? >
+1 if there is another flowplayer-product it is hard for newcomers to decide which product they should choose for a video solution in Plone. There are too many half finished (video)-products for Plone already. Why you don't put some effort in polishing/finishing one of the existing instead of creating a new one? -Tom > -- > Roel Bruggink > http://www.fourdigits.nl/mensen/roel-bruggink > > Four Digits BV > http://www.fourdigits.nl > Willemsplein 44, 6811 KD, Arnhem > tel: +31(0)26 4422700 fax: +31(0)84 2206117 > KVK 091621370000 BTW 8161.22.234.B01 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Product-Developers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers -- My Book "Plone 3 Multimedia" ist available! http://amzn.to/dtrp0C Tom Gross [email protected] skype.....................tom_gross web.........http://toms-projekte.de blog...http://blog.toms-projekte.de _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
