[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: MB Software Solutions General Account
There comes a point where you have to draw the line. We shouldn't be
the police for the rest of the world, nor is it our duty to pay them
zillions of dollars in aid. Sure, it's a goodwill gesture, but where do
you draw the line? Think of it this way: you and I and many others
make a contribution to St. Jude's, American Cancer Society, and many
other charitable organizations every year, but we don't give to EVERY
charity. Why? We'd go broke just trying to be a generous person. You
have to draw the line somewhere. That's a good moral debate I suppose.
You crack me up.
We don't like one group so any like or near you can take a hike.
<http://tinyurl.com/m9828>
So what your saying above is somewhat incorrect.
Our leadership in this arena is pathetic. Condi Rice would serve the
President better in this position. <http://tinyurl.com/mxwcf>
Hey, perhaps we get it wrong sometimes, but when do you say "when"?
When is enough enough? I'm not saying "screw the rest of the world" but
you just can't give handouts to everybody and their brother if those
folks aren't accountable. I mean, that's why I was under the impression
we stopped giving as much money to some countries because it was not
going to the people but instead to the corrupt and powerful.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
