Dominic Burford wrote:
<snip>
the cranks who criticise you when you reference an internet site, will
do just the same when trying to prop up their own infantile claims).
Hi Dominic!
You damned hypocrite. You inferred to "many studies" then when called on
it said it wasn't from the internet. OK, then, come forth with the "many
studies", they must have titles and authors, if they even exist at all
they will be cataloged on the internet, if not published.
The internet is news, but often the news is fake. The internet is rarely
science, but can sometimes be news of science.
You never accept any references from the internet that *refute* you, but
you have been known to cite web references you find entertaining of your
own bias. Looks like wanting it both ways to me.
Regards,
Pete
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
