On Aug 2, 2006, at 5:31 AM, Dominic Burford wrote:

PETA have *never* endorsed, encouraged or embraced any form of terrorist
activity.

Are you using 'terrorist' in the George Bush meaning of the word, or in its actual meaning, which is to promote change through random acts that inspire fear? In their campaign against the wearing of animal fur, it was a common tactic for PETA members to douse fur-wearers in public with blood or a blood-like liquid. They showed up unannounced, and it was this fear of being doused in blood that forced many people to change their fur-wearing habits.

You're saying that these events, which happened (and still do) quite regularly, were not the work of PETA, but by large numbers of 'rogue' members across the world who all happened to employ the same tactic in the same manner? Has any official PETA statement been made that disavowed these tactics, and called for those who carried them out to be put in jail?

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com





_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to