Germany had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor

--- john harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Well, we ALL linked them together, but the president
> never said it.
> Everyone has that "feeling" that the Arabs are
> working in concert to kill
> us, but since we haven't found an instruction manual
> that has a bibliography
> listing all the players, we can't SAY who is
> involved. I think there's a
> connection, but I don't have proof.  The media is
> playing the gotcha game,
> but W ain't participating in this round.
> 
> John
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Michael Madigan
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 11:53 AM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Another Bush Lie
> 
> No one ever linked 911 with Iraq.  That is not true
> 
> --- Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Sep 11, 2006, at 2:26 AM, Anthony L. Testi
> wrote:
> > 
> > > The following quote from the online WSJ
> summerizes
> > my thinking, but  
> > > I am open to changing it.
> > >
> > > "This administration never said that the 9/11
> > attacks were  
> > > orchestrated between Saddam and al Qaeda," Bush
> > said. "We did say  
> > > there were numerous contacts between Saddam
> > Hussein and al Qaeda."
> > 
> >     There has been constant linking of Iraq with 9/11
> > since it happened;  
> > this isn't a coincidence, but a deliberate attempt
> > to link the two  
> > without having to say the actual words. After all,
> > if Saddam merely  
> > had contacts with al Qaeda, and nothing at all to
> do
> > with the 9/11  
> > attacks, why would his name and that of Iraq be
> > repeatedly mentioned  
> > in the same breath as 9/11?
> > 
> >     But probably the most damning case can be made by
> > reading the letter  
> > issued by Bush on March 19, 2003 that began the
> war;
> > it contains this  
> > language:  "continuing to take the necessary
> actions
> > against  
> > international terrorists and terrorist
> > organizations, including those  
> > nations, organizations, or persons who planned,
> > authorized,  
> > committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that
> > occurred on September  
> > 11, 2001." This isn't some slip of the tongue at a
> > press conference;  
> > this is the letter required by the authorization
> for
> > military action  
> > that Congress passed, and which started the
> invasion
> > of Iraq.
> > 
> >     But if you are truly interested in learning some
> > recent history,  
> > here are links to several articles in different
> > publications going  
> > back a few years. Read them, and see if you come
> > away with the  
> > impression that the Bush administration was
> > attempting to link Saddam  
> > with 9/11.
> > 
> >
> http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0314/p02s01-woiq.html
> >
>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50679-2004Jun17.html
> >
>
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/attack/140133_bushiraq18.html
> >
>
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/08/28/cheney-biographer/
> > 
> >
>
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13323
> >
> http://www.antiwar.com/orig/zunes.php?articleid=3783
> > http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/06/29/hayes.911/
> > 
> > -- Ed Leafe
> > -- http://leafe.com
> > -- http://dabodev.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> > Subscription Maintenance:
> > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> > OT-free version of this list:
> > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated
> otherwise,
> > are the opinions of the author, and do not
> > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> > too stupid to see the obvious.
> > 
> 
> 
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to