"competitive"? "Up to date"?
The software either works or it doesn't work. It doesn't sound like
this software is being sold to anyone else, right, Stephen?
I just went through this shiite four years ago. The idiots that ran the
company I was working for (into the ground) made the decision to get the
software "up to date and competitive" and ended up bankrupting the
company and selling what was left and the customer list to a competitor.
This sounds very PHB to me...
John Baird wrote:
Because that's the way people keep their software up to date and
competitive.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of MB Software Solutions
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 10:55 AM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [JOB] Looking for a VFP to .NET conversion team
Stephen Russell wrote:
My old boss is looking to get his VFP app converted to .NET I am
starting a new gig next week so I can't pull this off. This has NO
DOCUMENTATION. He realizes that he has to pay some serious $$$ just to
get that completed, let alone do the conversion.
Not sure if anyone asked this or not...but what was wrong with the VFP
version...i.e., why the need to convert to DotNet?
--
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
