Would you know if XP/64 is still an option and if so does it run on the same hardware?
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Michael Oke, II <oke...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you are running the 32-bit version of XP, then yes. It's an OS limitation. > > > Michael Oke, II > 661-349-6221 > > Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. > > On Mar 11, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Lew Schwartz <lew1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Isn't 4g the XP pro max? ... and even then, video and system use the top .5. >> >> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Dan Covill <dcov...@san.rr.com> wrote: >>> On 03/10/12 17:13, Lew Schwartz wrote: >>>> OK, not solved, but pulling all the memory and just blowing all the >>>> dust I could see out, removing the video and putting back the original >>>> mem sticks, letting it start up, power down, reinstall video, power up >>>> .... worked. Now I'm back to sq 1 with 2 gigs. Didn't like the new >>>> sticks, I guess. Who invented these damn things anyway? >>> >>> Take Mike Madigan's advice and go to Crucial.com. I ran their evaluator >>> and discovered that most of the specials I was eyeing at Fry's won't run >>> in my Mobo! Their prices are pretty good, too. >>> >>> BTW, I wouldn't give up on this. I have 4GB, and plan to go to 8 soon. >>> >>> Dan >>> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cafuu78ea95ay7nxa92hesd6jdughk8obnhsbfl2r0cz5n3b...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
