OK - I suspect that this next comment of mine may open-a-can-o-worms, and may also have people bashing me for it - but, here goes...
Why make a Class? The screen I created is a simple Form, with controls on it. I made no Class, although, its not to say I "have no class". Also, don't forget - this screen is going to be called from an OLD type system (that looks like FP for DOS with white letters on blue background) - as well as from a newer type system (regular graphical windows). So, I'm trying to KISS and make a screen that can be called from both systems without a problem. The old system does NOT use ANY Classes - FYI. So far - what I have working - and DOES work in both systems - such, that when I hit a button to do a search - in the old system you get the blue background and running old code - where as when the screen is run under the new system - it pops-up a new window and does the proper graphical looking search! -K- -----Original Message----- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Allen Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 12:26 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: Accessing Form Objects Numerically... Being that setall works (AFAIK) on control types, then it should not. But as you should create (in theory) a class from the bass classes then you can setall on that class. So as long as you have a load of MyClass controls you can setall those only. Al -----Original Message----- From: Kurt Wendt Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 6:18 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: Accessing Form Objects Numerically... Even if I add something later - it will still be a Visual Control with a Visible property. But, if I use the SetAll - and there Was a New Control that did NOT have a Visible property - I suspect that the SetAll command would NOT throw an Error. Or am I wrong... [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a140e260...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
