A GREAT BIG THANK YOU to everyone who made suggestions.... Problem solved: A separate procedure was "re-setting" my original set procedure. Not exactly sure why it worked in my test environment, but Production is now working properly! Whew!
Thank You All Again! Regards, Desmond On 22 April 2014 04:05, Man-wai Chang <chan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Check the scope of memory variables used by the codes that were moved > to the procedure file. > > Maybe there were duplicates or whatever.... Use PRIVATE and even LOCAL to > limit > them if necessary to avoid name conflicts. > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Desmond Lloyd <desmond.ll...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > HELP! > > Began to get errors that file could not be found when executing "valid > > functions" after certain reads. Solution was to move those back to the > > original program file. > > .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY! > / v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3) > /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw > ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you! > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAAJXvaO9v-tsyzG_hP=xbxlwtqkfi2rd1phkmxq3o2ydccj...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
