No Fox DBFs...just using Fox cursors to work with MySQL (MariaDB) data.
On 2014-06-11 13:17, Paul Hill wrote:
On 11 Jun 2014 16:57, <mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>
wrote:
Paul Hill had mentioned something about the Code Pages and/or
encoding.
I figured that happens to data behind the scenes, not necessarily if
an
end-user is touching it. ???
It was just an idea. If your 'language for non Unicode programs' is not
the
same as your dbf setting (see CpDbf()) then fox could convert it into
the
current codepage.
There was a Spanish ñ in your example. I'm pretty sure Polish or
Russian
doesn't have this. Just something to be aware of.
On 2014-06-11 11:47, Richard Kaye wrote:
If the users never directly interact with the value why would that be
a
concern?
--
rk
-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 11:42 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Interesting GOTCHA from 16-byte binary key
LOL...so back to the remaining question: do you think that non-USA
users might encounter issues if I'm using the binary instead of the
unicode or ansi human readable options? Here they are again from
VFP2C32's help:
* 0 = ansi human readable (38 wide)
* 1 = unicode (76 wide)
* 2 = binary (16 wide)
tia,
--Mike
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/753f3edcc90a461e155036792d13f...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
