An IBM Business Partner switches off of MySQL to go with DB2? Are they
paying to be an IBM Business Partner? It seems like they're paying a
lot in fees for a 300 course database with related child tables. Heck,
I would think Access could handle that load.
"By converting to IBM DB2 9, Makau saved about $75,000 in MySQL and
Windows server licensing fees"
I understand the savings on Windows Server licensing, but MySQL?!? I'm
not getting the whole picture here.
Kevin Cully
CULLY Technologies, LLC
Sponsor of Fox Forward 2006!
http://foxforward.net
Stephen Russell wrote:
> The number one reason we moved to DB2 9 is cost savings. We were spending a
> lot on licenses with MySQL -- and DB2 9 Express-C 9 is free.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
