[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > like I said > we went in and libereated kuwait > > a fact you choose to ignore in order to make your point
Well, they went in and 'libereated' the towers. And that's also a fact you shouldn't ignore, acts have consequences. > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subj: Re: [OT] -- Iraq articles > Date: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:03 am > Size: 1K > To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com> > > On Jan 21, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > >> If the US gave the greenlight to invade kuwait, then why did we run >> them out >> of there ? >> Seems to me that your theory is a lot different then the history that >> actually happened. > > Oh, geez - everything is a theory with you now, is it? The cables > that documented the meeting between April Glaspie and Saddam Hussein > are theories, too, as is whether or not it contained English words, > or some cleverly-encoded language that was designed to look like > perfect English? The communications of our Ambassador are well- > documented, had you bothered to look them up before spitting out > another "seems to me" baseless opinion. > > Just because you choose to be ignorant of a fact does not weaken the > validity of that fact. > > -- Ed Leafe > -- http://leafe.com > -- http://dabodev.com > > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
