Greetings!

I just found that Microsoft released virtual PC 2007 and downloaded it.  I
have yet to install it as I will need to beef up one of my PCs.  It will run
on XP Pro, 2003 server, and of course Vista.  I have one PC, an AMD 2.9 GHz
machine, with 1.5 gig of RAM, which may not be quite adequate to run virtual
PC 2007 with Vista as the guest operating system.  So I guess I'll be
beefing it up with another gig of RAM (the motherboard maxes at 3.0 gig).
The objective will be to recompile some of my VFP 7.0 apps under VFP 9.0
(under XP Pro), then seeing how well they run in Vista.

Has anyone yet used virtual PC 2007 with Vista as the guest offering system?
I have seen a few e-mails regarding VFP 9.0 running and compiled under the
Vista operating system, but nothing has stood out with respect to any
serious problems (other than Vista protection issues in general).  Also, has
anyone yet run and compiled Sedna beta apps under Vista?  If so, are there
any advantages to using Sedna (even if in beta) over using VFP 9.0?

As a closing comment, I absolutely love the Mac guy versus PC guy
commercials where a security agent has to clear all incoming and outgoing to
vacations with the PC guy.  Apple truly nailed it with that commercial.  The
unfortunate reality is that my target market will be in the Microsoft
quagmire for many years, I see no escape into the Linux world despite any
question regarding running compiled VFP apps under Linux.

Regards,

Gil


Gilbert M. Hale 
New Freedom Data Resources 
Pittsford, NY 
585-359-8085 - Office (Rolls To Cellular) 
585-202-4341 - Cellular/VoiceMail 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  application/ms-tnef
---


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to