No daylight savings time here in Tucson.

It's about 85 and sunny. I'm thawing out...

C



Ted Roche wrote:
> On 3/11/07, mrgmhale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   
>> I am still here despite the much feared, even more hated, Daylight Saving
>> Time change!  And all of my business PCs updated correctly (including the
>> NT4SP6a Server with a 3rd party patch).  The M$ Win2000ProSP4 patch even
>> worked!
>>     
>
> My blogging...
>
> The smoke clears after the DST spring-ahead …
> By tedroche
>
> … and we'll see if any news develops. Either: nothing will happen and
> news media will point at IT for once again crying Y2K wolf, despite a
> lot of sysadmins sleepless nights last week and this weekend. Or some
> major system will fail and the media will conclude IT isn't taking
> their role seriously enough. Either way we lose, eh?
>
> Here's the score here at Roche Manor: a power blackout at 0045 this
> morning reset most of the home appliances for us, so we could just
> find all the stuff blinking "12:00″ to reset. One Win2K laptop reset
> fine, thanks to our manual intervention with tzedit.exe in advance.
> One WinXPPro machine sprung two hours in advance instead of one. Two
> Linux laptops and three Linux servers Just Worked Fine. And the iMac
> wonders what all the fuss is about.
>
> Now we wait to see what happens on the traditional Spring Ahead Day…
>
> P.S. Two WinbXPPro laptops sprang x2 hours. I think each was booted
> into Linux first, and perhaps that updated the computer's clock before
> the Windows machine. Resetting the WinXPPro machines by having them
> synch with the internet time servers seemed to clear it up. I don't
> run any software on the machines know to be DST-incompliant (Outlook,
> Exchange, etc.)
>
>   


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to