That is so strange. I've had a Linksys WRT54G for 1 or 2 years and have never had a problem. I'm even running the factory firmware (upgraded to the latest of course). Goes to show that YMMV is a very true statement.
Regards Rodney > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:profoxtech- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Skelley > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 3:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NF] Home Wireless router suggestions > > Lou: > Long time no chat... > Dump the Linksys and look for a Netgear box. I had exactly the same > issues with a Linksys and no matter what it would > lock up on our Cablevision system. So one day after the 5th or so reset > (for the day) I bounced it off the wall and > bought a Netgear box and haven't had an issue since (well over a year > with no lockups). > I did all the firmware updates, cleaned the connectors, run new quad > shielded cable, had Cablevision over to check the > line, blah, blah, blah and nothing fixed it. It still locked up. > Look at Staples when they run a sale on the units and with > coupons/rebates/rewards you can buy one for under $20. I > think I paid $10 for mine. Trust me it isn't worth the issues to keep > the Linksys (IMHO) with all the issues I had. > Cisco should be ashamed of themselves! > Regards, > > Jack > > > Lou Syracuse wrote: > > Have had a Linksys for a while .. HATE IT! Locks up constantly, > has to > > be power-cycled several times a day. The wired-only Linksys > router I > > worked great so i was expecting better - but this one has been > nothing but > > trouble. I know I am not alone in having issues with it. Has been > > getting worse for the last week or so. it needs to go - now! > > > > Most of our wireless cards support 802.11g so that would be nice. > Needs a > > few wired ports as well, gigbit is nice but not required as only my > notebook > > has one. > > > > Any suggestions? dLink? newer Linksys? Something else? > > > > > > > > Lou Syracuse > > Senior Programmer/Analyst > > Executive Information Systems > > Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. > > > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > _ _ _ > > > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended > > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are > addressed. > > If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the > > originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this e- > mail > > message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. > > > > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual > sender, > > except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to > be the > > views of Merle Norman Cosmetics. > > > > > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > _ _ _ > > > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom > > they are addressed. > > If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the > > originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this > > e-mail message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. > > > > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual > > sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority, > > states them to be the views of Merle Norman Cosmetics. > > > > > > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > > multipart/alternative > > text/plain (text body -- kept) > > text/html > > --- > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.