Leland, No, I'm basing my conclusions on Dr. Lori K. Fenton (PhD in Planetary Science) who is a Principle Investigator for NASA.
You can find out more about her here: http://humbabe.arc.nasa.gov/~fenton/ v/r //SIGNED// Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF 6th MDG Data Services Manager 6th MDG Information System Security Officer Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:42 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] George Bush Is Destroying Mars Too Your basing your conclusions on the assumptions of Dr David Whitehouse, but I base my belief on the vast majority of the Scientific community that were specifically asked to study the problem, and concluded with a greater than 90% probability that human pollution increasing the atmosphere's greenhouse effect was responsible for global warming. I will use and analogy to help you understand why the green house effect is probably causing global warming. During the winter time I add a blanket to my bed to help keep me warm. The blank traps the warm air under the blanket to keep it close to my body. To add additional warmth, I can add another blanket. I believe the CO2 in the atmosphere is somehow interacting with other chemical elements to increase the green house effect which is causing the planet to warm. It could be the CO2 allow more radiation from the sun to reach the surface of the earth, or it may interact with other particales in the atmosphere increasing the green house effect. There could be any number of factors that are interacting with each other to cause the problem of global warming including the sun, dust and other solid particles of pollution emited into the atmosphere, a gigantic amount of CO2 dumped into the atmosphere, a decrease in planet life and increase in asphalt and other desert like surfaces, over population of earth, etc. It is not exactly clear how CO2 is interacting with other things to contribute to the green house effect, but since we have greatly changed the balance of matter that makes up the upper atmosphere by dumping heaps of CO2 into it, CO2 has to be a prime suspect of global warming. #------------------------------------- The Green House Effect: Without the greenhouse effect, scientists estimate that the temperature on earth would fall to 100 degrees below zero Fahrenheit and the oceans would freeze. The greenhouse effect is essential to the survival of life on earth. The global warming theorists are worried about a runaway greenhouse effect that they presume to have occurred on the planet Venus resulting in extremely high estimated temperatures on that planet. #------------------------------ I think Dr David Whitehouse's last name say everything I need to know about his assumptions. <g> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/358953.stm http://www.renewamerica.us/analyses/050317hutchison.htm http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/co2-in-ice-cores/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_controversy Regards, LelandJ Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote: > Gee, Leland, the common cause is in the virtual center of our planetary > system. You know it's a big yellow ball and quite bright to look at > during the daytime and causes sunburns. > > <ggg> > > v/r > > > //SIGNED// > > Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF > 6th MDG Data Services Manager > 6th MDG Information System Security Officer > Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 2:45 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] George Bush Is Destroying Mars Too > > The lengths to which you are willing to go to maintain your mental > balance by way of denial is astonishing. > > If there is some common cause between the Earth and Mars that has the > effect of warming our planets, then I would suggest we get busy and find > > out what it is. If this is true, we could eliminate the cause/effect > relationship that human pollution is causing a warming of Mars and > Earth, because Mar is absent human life and the pollution occurring on > earth remain localized to our planet. > > If there we such a common cause of warning which has the effect of > warming both Earth and Mars, I would expect that cause to manifest > itself in other areas within our solar system, and perhaps beyond our > solar system. The cause could not be from increased radiation form the > sun, since the radiation of the Sun has been constant for as long as > human have know how to measure it. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > > > Robert Calco wrote: > >> This one is for you, Leland, ol' buddy. >> >> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1720024.ece >> >> - - - >> Mars is being hit by rapid climate change and it is happening so fast >> > that the red planet could lose its southern ice cap, writes Jonathan > Leake. > >> Scientists from Nasa say that Mars has warmed by about 0.5C since the >> > 1970s. This is similar to the warming experienced on Earth over > approximately the same period. > >> Since there is no known life on Mars it suggests rapid changes in >> > planetary climates could be natural phenomena. > >> - - - >> >> Ya think? >> >> - Bob >> >> >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
