Think about what you just said.
You're on trial
You're innocent.
Why would your lawyer believe that you were guilty.

Now look at the other side.
You're on trial
You're guilty
You brag to your attorney OR you offer to make him a wealthy man/woman

Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Pete Theisen
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 7:33 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll

On Tuesday 15 May 2007 8:03 pm, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> Think about what you just said.
> If innocent people are getting convicted, don't you think that there is a
> chance it is because of these same unscrupulous lawyers ??
>
> If that were the case, then getting rid of unscrupulous attorneys would
fix
> both problems.

Hi Virgil!

Providing legal counsel to a guilty but presumed innocent person is a 
constitutionally protected activity, hardly unscrupulous. If the lawyer were

bringing the perp drugs in jail, that would be unscrupulous.

Now you think about what YOU just said. You are on trial, you are innocent
but 
your lawyer decides that you are guilty and dumps you. Wouldn't everyone
else 
ask "Why did his lawyer dump him?" What kind of a fair trial do you get
then? 
You are innocent, remember?

But cheer up, You might get a nice cell. Better than being homeless.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to