John Weller wrote: > Yes - make her type them all back in by hand! :-) > > Seriously though, I'd never have thought of that. I'd have done a scan loop > with a seek() but yours is much better. I tend to avoid relations as they > have bit me in the past, pure laziness on my part I accept. > > The problem was trying to match the old records to new ones without a PK to seek. Without using the recno() relation you would have had to generate a key using the company name and parts of the address or some other attribute, then check you only had 1 match in the other table. Too messy for my liking. :-)
Peter _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
