The Supreme Court probably upheld President Roosevelt's Executive Order 9066, because it was written such that all people could be excluded from certain areas of the U.S., but then President Roosevelt used it exclusively against Americans of Japanese ancestry. The way President Roosevelt went about this reminds me of the way the Bush Administration has used and abused the Judicial system.
Regards, LelandJ Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > I went back and re-read that portion of the Wiki, and I'm shocked that > the Supreme Court ruled Constitutional the way the Japanese American's > civil rights were violated. I certainly don't think this could happen > today except in the undeniable presents of the gravest threat to the > American people. I simply misread the below except thinking the Supreme > Court ruled the treatment of Japanese American people as > unconstitutional. The Supreme Courts upholding of President Roosevelt's > Executive Order 9066 is also one of the most shameful ruling ever handed > down by the Surpeme Court in the history of the US. These were > decisions based on FEAR. The Fear. > > #------------------------------------------ > President Franklin Roosevelt authorized the internment with Executive > Order 9066, which allowed local military commanders to designate > "military areas" as "exclusion zones", from which "any or all persons > may be excluded." This power was used to declare that all people of > Japanese ancestry were excluded from the entire Pacific coast, including > all of California and most of Oregon and Washington, except for those in > internment camps. In 1944, the Supreme Court upheld the > constitutionality of the exclusion, removal, and detention, arguing that > it is permissible to curtail the civil rights of a racial group when > there is a "pressing public necessity." > > #------------------------------------- > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > > President Franklin Roosevelt > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Roosevelt> authorized the > internment with Executive Order 9066 > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_9066>, which allowed local > military commanders to designate "military areas" as "exclusion zones", > from which "any or all persons may be excluded." This power was used to > declare that all people of Japanese ancestry were excluded from the > entire Pacific coast, including all of California and most of Oregon and > Washington, except for those in internment camps.^[4] > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_American_internment#_note-korematsu_roberts> > > In 1944, the Supreme Court > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States> upheld > the constitutionality of the exclusion, removal, and detention, arguing > that it is permissible to curtail the civil rights of a racial group > when there is a "pressing public necessity."^[5] > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_American_internment#_note-korematsu_majority> > > > > > > Pete Theisen wrote: > >> On Saturday 19 May 2007 11:09 am, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: >> <snip> >> >> >>>>> Your raving like a radical extremist yourself, Pete. <g> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> <g> to you as well! It worked in WW II. If it hadn't worked the libs and >>>> Ds would be favoring it now. >>>> >>>> >>> Muslim men could be shot on sight if they did not surrender for placement >>> into US Gulags >>> >>> >> Hi Leland! >> >> You are starting to twist people's words the way Ed does. I didn't say >> Gulag. >> What I was talking about was this: Leftist darling F.D. Roosevelt's >> executive >> order. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_American_internment >> >> Gulag indeed. Assigned to the discression of the military to determine >> exclusion zones. And only a few casualties. >> >> I suppose today's commanders would keep the 'slims away from population >> centers, large highways, ports, rail, airports and the like. If so, the >> disloyal or cowardly 'slims could live free way out in the sticks, if they >> so >> desired. The brave, loyal 'slims would fight beside us, and wear our uniform. >> >> > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
