Hi Lew > Message: 10 > Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 16:12:35 -0400 > From: "Lew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Object engineering #2 (Lew) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I wasn't recommending that we give up using the controlsource > property/feature. I'm just attracting attention > to the fact that a direct reference to the data store subverts the > intervention of governance by the business > and data layers. I don't understand your second comment. Nothing needs to be > rewired if it's done properly in > the first place.
For sake of clarification, if you built your application with direct references to the data store (views/cursors, not directly to the table) - you can still have the business objects 'govern' or 'manage' access to the data store. If you choose to make the business objects micro-manage the data store you'd have to change said applications' forms to bind to the business objects - which I see as similar to re-wiring the house. :) _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
