On Feb 12, 2008, at 10:21 AM, John Koziol wrote:
> Would not surprise me in the least. The Clinton's play dirty and I
> think the delegate difference between Clinton and Obama will be well
> within the margin of the number of superdelegates.
First: superdelegates have been around for decades; there's nothing
new here.
Second: why should anyone assume that they will automatically go for
Clinton? The most visible superdelegate, Ted Kennedy, has already
declared support for Obama.
You running out of conspiracy theories, and need to start a new
one? ;-)
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
