Nicholas Geti wrote: > Near death experiences are hokum. Ghosts are baloney. Deprive the brain of > oxygen and that person is going to see balls of light. Smoking pot or taking > Angel Dust does the same thing. That proves nothing. >
Please let it be. Can't you see that he is terrified of death. If believing some bullshit calms his terrors then let him be. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Madigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 12:08 PM > Subject: Re: [OT] Prince Harry in Afghanistan vs Obama's schedule > > >> Life after death has so many eyewitness testimonies >> that there has to be something to it. You can be >> convicted of murder without a dead body if there are >> valid eyewitnesses who say they saw you do it, so why >> can't we use eyewitnesses to "prove" an afterlife? >> >> Near death experiences, ghosts, mediums, religious >> visions, etc.. all point towards the existance of an >> afterlife. Is it scientically proveable? Is love >> scientifically proveable? No. >> _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
