Rick Schummer wrote: > > I > personally think the UT is the center of the negative energy in the Fox > Universe, yet I found the > information in the old UT Magazine to be quite good. Some very bright people > write for this magazine > and the content was worth the time I spent reading it. Can't ask for much > more. I have not read > every word of every issue and might even have missed many issues completely, > but I don't ever recall > reading anything that resembled the stereotypical reputation the UT has made > for itself over the > years. > > Coincidence of the name is the owner and branding, but you can read the > magazine without having to > visit the forum and deal with the UT politics. It is a *separate* resource > with knowledge coming > from the authors, not necessarily the UT owner or the trolls who make the > forum an unhappy place. > The UT Mag was free, but I am not sure it will be in its second life. So why > not take advantage of > the resource if it can make one's development life better? > >
What about the post-mortem on the UT....how/why did it become some a negative black hole for the Fox universe? Surely it can't all be blamed on he who's initials need not be mentioned? One man can screw the entire pooch. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
