I've done some research into this problem and may have it solved. Googling on 'matching_file_name', which appears in the Vista generated appcompat.txt report file, came up with
http://www.appsboss.com/archiver/?tid-36.html contains an 'appcompat.txt' report and this response: "You are looking for the first occurrence of the value for "MATCHING_FILE_NAME" and "SIZE". These values indicate which file has the issue and what the file size is." In this case, the 1st occurance is BLAT.DLL, version 2.5.0.0. Did some searching for blat, to see if I have the latest release, and http://sourceforge.net/project/downloading.php?group_id=81910&use_mirror =internap&filename=blat262.full.zip&25223288 shows blat262 as the current version. It's 120kb and dated 2/25/2007 Also noticed that http://www.geocities.com/toby_korn/blat/ has a link to download "blat3_1.zip", which I suppose means 3.1. However, this version is 112kb and dated 1/24/2002, so even though this name's version # is higher, it seems 262 is really the latest, so I'll go with 262. I'll guess I'll have to unregister blat250 on customer machine, then install/register blat262 to update blat on his machine - and presumably get rid of this problem. Can't have VFP product users getting Vista compatibility reports! Right away they'll think it's VFP that's incompatible, which is not the case. Hopefully these actions will resolve this problem. Bill _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
