> VFP rocks with real database servers, > and you can spend your time making great solutions instead of coding > around the file system limitations.
Perfectly stated. Gil > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Leafe > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 10:53 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: VFP and PostgreSQL used to process FTC DoNotCall updates > > > On Mar 24, 2008, at 10:54 AM, Charlie Coleman wrote: > > >> Easy? Sounds more like a hack. > > > > You do realize that some DB servers do similar things. E.g. table > > partitioning. Sure with VFP you have to construct more on your own > > sometimes. But that often gives you more opportunities to optimize > > for your > > situation. > > > How a server actually stores and retrieves its data is irrelevant. > The only thing that matters is that you can get out whatever you put in. > > I'm aware of projects such as the Chunnel that used VFP to manage > huge amounts of data. I'm not saying that it is not possible, just > that it's no longer desirable. VFP rocks with real database servers, > and you can spend your time making great solutions instead of coding > around the file system limitations. > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
