Gil Hale wrote: > Actually, I happened across that technique out of a desperate situation when > I was working with a Remote View on a Pervasive database table with over 60 > million records. But I was actually using GO BOTTOM at first, in an effort > to force the data to come over more quickly than its lolly-gagging slow-mo > default speed. It was a life saver, worked great. I spoke with Ed about > it, then posted it as an Advisor Tip. Ed responded in the printed tip by > stating the GO BOTTOM works fine, but it moves the record pointer. If a > person did not want to move the record pointer one could do RECCOUNT() and > get the same performance result. Of course he was right, and I have opted > to use RECCOUNT() ever since, just in case I do not want to move a pointer. > >
This is only when dealing with remote views, correct, and NOT with SPT cursors, right? _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
