> OTOH I'm into Python, not because VFP is dead (at 
> my working place I am only authorized to program VFP) but BECAUSE I
LOVE 
> the bloody language. After tasting Python I just couldn't be thrilled
at doing 
> something with VFP. And I think that if you tried it, the same might 
> happen to you.

I haven't said anything about Python because I don't know enough to
comment. I am taking all that's said to heart. 

> As for the business side of the issue... if your apps are relatively 
> well coded you shouldn't have too much of a hassle porting 
> them.

I never liked LOC valuations because they are so arguable, but
nevertheless it's still possible to obtain a number (total project cost
/ lines of code) using it. I've heard numbers from others that range
from $5/LOC up, but taking the lowest number I've heard, $5, then 5 *
300,000 = $ 1.5 million. I would say, all arguments considered, that is
a reasonable number. 

Now, let's say that in the very best, ideal circumstances, which never
happens, another re-write would cost a fraction of that number, say
1/5th, that's in the ballpark of $ 300,000. 

It will be a cold day in Hell when I throw another $300k+++ into yet
another re-write. I'll take my chances and see what our world looks like
in 7 years. I'm willing to bet that I'm not crazy and more and better
options will emerge.


> Or you could keep the old apps and do every new development in 
> Python. But hey, I just love the language so my view is obviously
biased.

I do hear you, but do you hear me? 


Bill




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to