Alan Bourke wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2008 10:07:19 +0200, "Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: >> Flash is way over the top for >> most web sites anyway and Ive not seen so far silverlight to be any >> better. > > But I think Silverlight is much more aimed at RIA (Rich Internet > Applications)
Yep, that's what the article said. > rather than whizz-bang websites, despite the impression > you might get from Silverlight.net. Sure, they push it on you, but I > guess the more machines it is on the better for them. Just like the DotNet runtime approach via Windows Update! _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
