Allen wrote: > I'm sure I saw a mention from the poster that he was not interested in > Linux. I don't have the old messages now so cant really be 100% > I still say the same that the averarge person could not do anything much > with the source anyway. Unless it was really required and paid for changes > which is fine. > Also, personaly I don't have any databases getting close to the 2 gig mark > so that's not an issue to me. > Also I never said MSSQL express is better, but I don't see why it should be > discounted from the list either. Not put at the top or bottom but just > included. > Allen
Open Source doesn't mean it's free!!!! Yes, you might have to pay someone with the know-how to change the code if you aren't able to, but at least that's an option!!! You can't get that option with closed source (like VFP)!!!! The way M$ killed off VFP: that's an easy reason to see why Open Source could be a better route to travel: at least you'd have the source so that someone else (able to manipulate it) could change it for whatever need---but probably not for free, but still, it *could* be done. Not so, with M$. Once they're done with the product, that's it, no matter who could change whatever after that point. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
