Wolfe, Stephen S Civ USAF AMC 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote: > That was pretty funny... <ggg>
>> Let me define 'taking over'; reducing the country's infrastructure to >> nothing and reducing the population to the point that resistance isn't >> viable. We haven't done that since 1945... > > You can tell you are USAF. Ever wondered why countries still keep > infantry and army? Destroying infrastructure is not enough, what > infrastructure was there in VN? Please! You can't wage a war from your > jet's cockpit, air force utility is limited. Hi Stephen! Viewed in its own context the Vietnam war made no sense. Viewed as a proxy war US vs. Soviet Union it *still* made no sense. If any nation should have wished to fight the Soviet Union the Reagan approach proved to be the correct one. It was simple: Reagan identified them as the target, then engaged them in an arms race that drove them to bankruptcy. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
