Pardon me - but I'm missing something here. If a protester is an anarchist, don't those combined labels make the whole thing an oxymoron? Sure, can be a protester IN an anarchistic society, sure, can protest IN a free society, but to be both at same time? What's the point?
We live in a free society here in USA. Why would anyone want to adopt anarchy in any form? Sure, some bureaucratic processes here stateside appear to be anarchy-like, but there is still balance, yes? Don't beat me up too much, only a little this time, ya? Richard, I'm with you - language is a verra terrible, 'orrible nastie beastie... One should master it 'fore taking it out for walkies.. I'm a Heinlein fan - I know of which book you speak.. Ken - maybe you are just repeating what you heard from the radio, and yer not really using that word , personally ? Mondo Regards [Bill] -- William Sanders / efGroup _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
