Because Obama makes his money off of sweetheart deals and the Government, he doesn't understand that most people work for private businesses. So giving someone a $1,000 check but taking away his $40,000 job because his employer needed to make up for his increased tax burden, is a big net loss.
************************************************* Barack Obama Antichrist gear http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike --- On Tue, 10/28/08, Larry Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Larry Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OT] guess you will go to a long lenght for > To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com> > Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2008, 11:42 AM > Ah, Pete, but if you've been listening to the > obamessiah, he has said on various occasions that > 'fairness' was more his goal than increased revenue. > If he were half as smart as he wants us to believe, he > would know the increase would be counterproductive. How can > we question the purity of his motives? > > Larry Miller > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Pete Theisen > To: ProFox Email List > Sent: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:43:40 +0000 (UTC) > Subject: Re: [OT] guess you will go to a long lenght for > > Stephen Russell wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Michael Madigan > wrote: > > > Are you really making a quarter or a mill and have to > worry? Few if > > any of my clients or friends at church will be over > that mark after > > the final exemptions and credits are taken. > > Hi Stephen! > > I guess you missed this: > > http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/23319.html > > "The Obama plan assumes little behavioral change from > such a large tax > hike on high-income workers. Is this realistic or will the > higher rates > encourage tax minimization strategies and reduced work > effort, which > will lead to lower tax revenues?" > > In the '50s the tax rates for the richies were an > eye-popping 90+%, but > they actually paid nothing, or next to nothing, through > "tax planning". > The loopholes are still there, but hardly worth using until > the rates go > up again. Reagan found that reducing the top rate increased > revenue, > this is why. > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://pete-theisen.com/ > > > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
