Yes, they'll only have to police businesses instead of individuals

--- On Tue, 11/4/08, Nicholas Geti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Nicholas Geti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [OT] IRS -- keep it or do away with it? (was Re: Amount of 
> moneydeposited into banks and IRS)
> To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
> Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2008, 7:43 PM
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Michael Madigan"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 2:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [OT] IRS -- keep it or do away with it? (was
> Re: Amount of 
> moneydeposited into banks and IRS)
> 
> 
> > You would still need an IRS to collect the sales tax.
> >
> 
> However, it would do away with thousands of bureaucrats
> whose jobs are to 
> police the system and make sure everyone is paying the
> correct amounts.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to