Rick Schummer wrote: > Matt, > > Love the enthusiasm, but one question: How are user group leaders suppose to deliver on value if > presenters are not willing to allow their sessions recorded or broadcasted. User group leaders > already struggle to get people to present stuff in front of small groups. Now I have to tell them > they could be watched by hundreds live or after via video? Not all groups are like Chicago or > Detroit where we get sponsorship to regularly bring in "big names" (for lack of better term) that > are more likely to allow recordings.
Well, we all need to embrace more socialism and spread the wealth. Oh wait....that's [OT]. ;-) > > So maybe leaders get half to agree, will people be satisfied when only half the meetings are > available when they bought a subscription for a year's worth of meetings? Maybe the agreement needs > to depend on levels of participation. That was my point. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
