This is not a task that all groups should pursue. I think that there are
maybe 3 or 4 groups that could pull this off, and so maybe between each of
them, there could at least be 1 meeting per month that is available to us
starving VFP'ers who do not have access to a thriving user group.

Maybe they could coordinate this on a rotation so that it was not overly
burdensome on any one person or group.




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Rick Schummer
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 10:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: When will User Group meetings go virtual (live on the web) ?

Matt,

Love the enthusiasm, but one question: How are user group leaders suppose to
deliver on value if
presenters are not willing to allow their sessions recorded or broadcasted.
User group leaders
already struggle to get people to present stuff in front of small groups.
Now I have to tell them
they could be watched by hundreds live or after via video? Not all groups
are like Chicago or
Detroit where we get sponsorship to regularly bring in "big names" (for lack
of better term) that
are more likely to allow recordings.

So maybe leaders get half to agree, will people be satisfied when only half
the meetings are
available when they bought a subscription for a year's worth of meetings?
Maybe the agreement needs
to depend on levels of participation.

Rick
White Light Computing, Inc.

www.whitelightcomputing.com
www.swfox.net
www.rickschummer.com



[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to