The Constitution is the Constitution, regardless of what you think.

************************************************* 
Barack Obama is not My President

http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike


--- On Fri, 12/5/08, Leland Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Leland Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [OT] Court challenges against Obama
> To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
> Date: Friday, December 5, 2008, 3:58 PM
> I would think that most people who believe Obama is not
> qualified to be 
> President; because, he is not a citizen of the USA as
> defined under the 
> USA constitution, would call for Obama to be disqualified
> by the Supreme 
> Court and Senator McClain made President of the USA by
> default, but that 
> would disenfranchise the majority of Americans who voted
> for Obama, and 
> circumvent the will of the people.
> 
> There are any number of methods that could be used so those
> supporting 
> such a proposition did not achieve the result they seek,
> like a 
> constitutional amendment allowing non-citizens to become
> president, or a 
> Supreme Court interpretation of citizenship that favoured
> President 
> Elect Obama.  I think it's time for you to get over
> your grief/denial 
> about the outcome of the election.  Can you determine, from
> the list 
> below, where you are in the process of dealing with matter
> that has so 
> upset you?
> 
> 1)  denial
> 2)  anger
> 3)  bargaining
> 4)  depression
> 5)  acceptance
> 
> I and the boys would be happy to help you work through this
> crisis in 
> any way we can.  LOL
> 
> Regards,
> 
> LelandJ
> 
> Michael Madigan wrote:
> > I don't know what what would happen.   If the
> ruling comes before inauguration day, I would suspect the
> election would be voided and a new election date set.
> >
> > If it comes after the inauguration, Obama would be
> forced to step down and Joe Biden would be president.
> >
> >
> >
> > ************************************************* 
> > Barack Obama is not My President
> >
> > http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike
> >
> >
> > --- On Fri, 12/5/08, Leland Jackson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> From: Leland Jackson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Subject: Re: [OT] Court challenges against Obama
> >> To: "ProFox Email List"
> <profox@leafe.com>
> >> Date: Friday, December 5, 2008, 3:19 PM
> >> Just for fun, let's assume President Elect
> Obama
> >> didn't meet the 
> >> "citizen of the USA" test defined under
> the US
> >> Constitution as necessary 
> >> to qualify for the Presidency.  What would be your
> solution
> >> to the 
> >> current state of affairs?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> LelandJ
> >>
> >>
> >> Michael Madigan wrote:
> >>     
> >>> If they don't rule on the case, then you
> have
> >>>       
> >> people continue to discover more and more things
> about the
> >> circumstances of his birth for the next 4 years.
> >>     
> >>> They have to act.
> >>>
> >>>
> ************************************************* 
> >>> Barack Obama is not My President
> >>>
> >>> http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --- On Fri, 12/5/08, Bob Calco
> >>>       
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>     
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>>> From: Bob Calco
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> Subject: RE: [OT] Court challenges against
> Obama
> >>>> To: "'ProFox Email
> List'"
> >>>>         
> >> <profox@leafe.com>
> >>     
> >>>> Date: Friday, December 5, 2008, 9:51 AM
> >>>> There is no way the court's going to
> hear
> >>>>         
> >> these cases
> >>     
> >>>> out. 
> >>>>
> >>>> Not because they are without merit, but
> because of
> >>>>         
> >> the
> >>     
> >>>> upheaval adherence to
> >>>> the letter of the law will create.
> We've long
> >>>>         
> >> ago given
> >>     
> >>>> up any pretence of
> >>>> caring about the Constitution's
> safeguards
> >>>>         
> >> against
> >>     
> >>>> tyranny.
> >>>>
> >>>> If they do real fact discovery and it is
> learned
> >>>>         
> >> that his
> >>     
> >>>> birthplace,
> >>>> allegiance and even citizenship at this
> point
> >>>>         
> >> really are
> >>     
> >>>> questionable -- and
> >>>> I think at this point they are, it *must*
> be given
> >>>>         
> >> his
> >>     
> >>>> behavior, no matter
> >>>> what that lame Snopes
> "refutation" said
> >>>>         
> >> (which
> >>     
> >>>> was really just a contrary
> >>>> assertion with no actual facts, which is
> unusual
> >>>>         
> >> for them)
> >>     
> >>>> -- then the howls
> >>>> and screams of the left will incite riots
> even
> >>>>         
> >> worse than
> >>     
> >>>> those incited by
> >>>> Raila Odinga in Kenya after he lost the
> election
> >>>>         
> >> fair and
> >>     
> >>>> square according
> >>>> to the law. Guess what, he's now PM
> because of
> >>>>         
> >> those
> >>     
> >>>> riots, murder and
> >>>> mayhem.
> >>>>
> >>>> They took a lot of flak for ruling in the
> negative
> >>>>         
> >> in 2000
> >>     
> >>>> on the
> >>>> "recount-till-we-find-the-votes"
> effort
> >>>>         
> >> Gore
> >>     
> >>>> engineered (and which Franken
> >>>> in Minnesota is trying, quite
> impressively, to
> >>>>         
> >> perfect). To
> >>     
> >>>> reverse the
> >>>> victory of a candidate because of this
> minor
> >>>>         
> >> little detail
> >>     
> >>>> about his being
> >>>> born in Kenya would set off
> you-have-no-idea-what,
> >>>>         
> >> and
> >>     
> >>>> severely destabilize
> >>>> our government. 
> >>>>
> >>>> Either way, Obama's agenda is moved
> forward.
> >>>>         
> >> They will
> >>     
> >>>> give it to him via
> >>>> the path of least resistance.
> >>>>
> >>>> And if you think it's normal that
> he'd go
> >>>>         
> >> see his
> >>     
> >>>> dying gramma without
> >>>> taking his wife and kids, and that
> Hawaiian
> >>>>         
> >> officials just
> >>     
> >>>> happened to seal
> >>>> his birth certificate during his
> "mercy"
> >>>>         
> >> trip,
> >>     
> >>>> and she just coincidentally
> >>>> died the night before his election, well,
> you
> >>>>         
> >> deserve the
> >>     
> >>>> next several years
> >>>> of pain we've got coming.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Bob 
> >>>>
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>>> Behalf Of Wolfe, Stephen S Civ USAF
> AMC 6
> >>>>>           
> >> MDSS/SGSI
> >>     
> >>>>> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 9:24
> AM
> >>>>> To: ProFox Email List
> >>>>> Subject: RE: [OT] Court challenges
> against
> >>>>>           
> >> Obama
> >>     
> >>>>> Yep, it is a slow news
> day...apparently...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> v/r
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> //SIGNED//
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF
> >>>>> 6th MDG Data Services Manager
> >>>>> 6th MDG Information System Security
> Officer
> >>>>> Comm (813) 827-9994  DSN 651-9994
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>>> Behalf Of Nicholas Geti
> >>>>> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 9:14
> AM
> >>>>> To: profox@leafe.com
> >>>>> Subject: [OT] Court challenges against
> Obama
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This morning's news mentioned
> court cases
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>> questioning Obama's birth
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>>> place are being filed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME
> parts
> >>>>>           
> >> ---
> >>     
> >>>>> multipart/alternative
> >>>>>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
> >>>>>   text/html
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to