OK, so let's remove Obama then.

************************************************* 
Barack Obama is not My President

http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike


--- On Sat, 12/6/08, Adam Buckland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Adam Buckland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [OT] Court challenges against Obama
> To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
> Date: Saturday, December 6, 2008, 2:00 AM
> If they are going to do that then let's get rid of
> handguns, assault
> rifles etc.... limit it to shotguns.
> 
> And whilst we're at it.. that pesky free speech thing
> causes trouble...
> as does freedom of information....
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Michael Madigan
> Sent: 05 December 2008 21:41
> .
> 
> If they want to amend the Constitution, then amend the
> Constitution,
> just don't break the Constitution.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to