Gil Hale wrote:
> I have done some work with VFP and PostgreSQL, and found it to be quite
easy
> to work with.  My needs were quite simple, so I have not bothered to cut
any
> of my commercial apps over to PostgreSQL for a back end.  But for what I
> needed (large database tables using parameterized views in VFP against
> PostgreSQL tables) the solution worked well.  That way I could look at the
> section of the database tables I needed without exceeding the VFP 2Gb limit
> for files (including temp cursor files).  The largest PostgreSQL table I
was
> accessing that was was over 16Gb.  Worked like a charm.
>
> Be certain to get some good books on PostgreSQL.  The is one called
> PostgreSQL For Windows that I found most useful in the Windows OS
platforms.
> All other books refer briefly to Windows, but focus more on Linux -
which at
> the time was not of interst to me.  Also be certain to get familiar with
> PGAdmin III to help manage and set up your database(s).  My next large step
> is to migrate to PostgreSQL on a Linux Server just for the connectivity
> without the CAL pricing.


Gil,

Did you mean to say PROGRESS instead of PostgreSQL?  Re-read my post.
I'm not looking to connect to PostgreSQL, but PROGRESS.  My client has
it, probably as part of his MAS 200 package (which he's not happy with,
and said "I can't tell you how much I've spent on this thing" --- and I
know I could have built his something to serve his needs for far LESS
I'll bet!).




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4840.69.251.251.31.1235136254.squir...@webmail.dssco.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to