Maybe because I don't use such powerful common words like 'vouchsafe'? and as for not taking me seriously? I consider the fact that you and pete and madagain disagree with me to be a badge of honour. I'm not sure that the lie of your own inerrancy has actually occurred to you. I accept the inerrancy of the Bible. Every other written and spoken word is subject to debate and disagreement. Your tomes are no different. And when you stop seeing antichrists everywhere you wil be taken seriously too.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob Calco Sent: Tuesday, 3 March 2009 2:58 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] US Rescue Efforts Risk Double-Dip Recession > > You're the one who questioned my faith, Bob. Suck it up. > You questioned mine first, then wasted many good counter point opportunities dwelling on your Hannibal Lecter act, trying to dissect my psychology. I didn't start getting strident with you until you crossed those boundaries---mainly out of respect for what I thought was a common metaphyics. Search the archives. BTW, I don't mind the jocular back-and-forth at this point. I lump you with Ricardo and rather enjoy your silly comments. And so do a lot of people. A lot, Geoff. Many. A large number Geoff simply don't take you seriously. May want to ask why, eh? :) - Bob [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
