Iva already heard your biblically unsound reasoning for Obama being the Antichrist. It is ludicrously inaccurate to say nothing of idiotic. I'm sure you thought the same of Clinton and Carter.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Tuesday, 3 March 2009 8:28 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] US Rescue Efforts Risk Double-Dip Recession Do you not believe in the Antichrist, or do you just mistakenly believe it's not Obama? ************************************************* 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336 --- On Mon, 3/2/09, Geoff Flight <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Geoff Flight <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [OT] US Rescue Efforts Risk Double-Dip Recession > To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, March 2, 2009, 11:33 PM > Maybe because I don't use such powerful common words > like 'vouchsafe'? and > as for not taking me seriously? I consider the fact that > you and pete and > madagain disagree with me to be a badge of honour. I'm > not sure that the lie > of your own inerrancy has actually occurred to you. I > accept the inerrancy > of the Bible. Every other written and spoken word is > subject to debate and > disagreement. Your tomes are no different. And when you > stop seeing > antichrists everywhere you wil be taken seriously too. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Bob Calco > Sent: Tuesday, 3 March 2009 2:58 PM > To: 'ProFox Email List' > Subject: RE: [OT] US Rescue Efforts Risk Double-Dip > Recession > > > > > You're the one who questioned my faith, Bob. Suck > it up. > > > > You questioned mine first, then wasted many good counter > point opportunities > dwelling on your Hannibal Lecter act, trying to dissect my > psychology. I > didn't start getting strident with you until you > crossed those > boundaries---mainly out of respect for what I thought was a > common > metaphyics. > > Search the archives. > > BTW, I don't mind the jocular back-and-forth at this > point. I lump you with > Ricardo and rather enjoy your silly comments. > > And so do a lot of people. A lot, Geoff. Many. A large > number Geoff simply > don't take you seriously. May want to ask why, eh? > > :) > > - Bob > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
