At 14:24 2009-09-02, MB Software Solutions, LLC
<mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
[snip]
>Thanks for the clarification, Gene. But you could have a situation
You are welcome.
>where you have a partial number, but then again, you just can't protect
My uni has four-digit internal numbers. I can see someone
entering just that instead of the full number since that is what he would use.
> against all kinds of bogus scenarios. It's the 80/20 rule...code for
It is worse when a user enters valid data and it is rejected
because of overzealous checking.
>the 80%, deal with the 20%.
Quite.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/20090902221136.451fb98...@marge.leafe.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
