Charlie Coleman wrote:
> All this really makes you wonder just how stupid the "higher ups" truly 
> are. If your workers let you know that support from MS is practically 
> meaningless, but you still shell out the millions per year to have it, what 
> kind of fool are you (is there really more than 1 kind)? And these same 
> higher ups are the ones that get into a tizzy when they hear "MS will stop 
> supporting Windows version x in 6 months." Their panic would be laughable 
> if it weren't so damaging. Their ignorance is appalling - and it's due to 
> their own laziness, the laziness of the developers under them, and the 
> FUD-barrage that MS masters. Pretty shameful huh? Probably the only wake-up 
> call they'll hear is when their company goes out of business - replaced by 
> a competitor spending a fraction of their cost on IT issues.
>   

If they have a problem then it's M$ responsibility, not theirs, they
still get their paychecks (and they don't even have to deal with it, YOU
do). If the company goes out of business they'll have a better resume
than you have, simply because they care about those things and because
'IT manager' looks better than 'IT solve everything' does. And they'll
probably get a bigger good bye check than you'll do. So if I was in
their shoes.... I'd probably do the same thing. The game is rigged so
that those who don't really care (and only care about Mr.Number 1) run
the show.

> Anyway, I would imagine that .Net support HAS to be better. Maybe that's 
> why everything else is still so bad. They took any support person that 
> could figure out how to at least open a paper bag and put them in the .Net 
> group. That's where MS has bet the farm. Too bad there are so many still 
> ignoring the past painful lessons.
>   

Did I ever tell you about this friend of mine who got beat by her
husband?  ;c)



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to