geoff wrote: > Im not sure how ONLY being the purchaser and not the original capturer > changes the equation in any significant way. It is factually interesting but > morally irrelevant. >
You are wrong, it is morally relevant! It says a lot about Johnny's moral fiber. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of John Harvey > Sent: Sunday, 21 March 2010 4:56 PM > To: 'ProFox Email List' > Subject: RE: [OT] Welcome to Deemocracy > > You might want to re-read the history on slavery in the US. The African > natives captured other tribes and sold them to the other countries (not the > US, like Portugal, Spain, The Netherlands, etc, who sold some to the US. > Slavery is still going on in parts of Africa, particularly by the Arabs. > > > John Harvey > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
