There would be blood in the streets if they tried that here in Australia.
Surely that has to be unconstitutional? I know little of your constitution
yet it has been a model for much of the world (other than gun rights).

I'd boycott the state too - economically too, if it were in my power.


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:26 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: [OT] Re: Southwest Fox 2010

On May 5, 2010, at 10:40 PM, geoff wrote:

> Why is there a boycott of Arizona?

        [Moved to OT]

        They passed a law that essentially says that the police can stop
anyone and demand proof of citizenship; if you don't have the proof on you,
you will be arrested. Think of all the WWII movies with Nazi guards
demanding "show me your papers", and you'll get the picture.

        You don't need to have done anything wrong to be targeted, so the
police will have to base their actions on appearances, so most likely those
whose skin is brown will be the focus of this effort.

        During tough economic times, politicians frequently find a scapegoat
for the public to focus their blame on, and this time it's Mexicans who
entered the US illegally. Kind of ironic, since it is this influx of cheap,
easily exploitable labor that is keeping many US businesses profitable, and
were they all to magically disappear, the increased labor costs would drive
many of them out of business.


-- Ed Leafe




[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to