Stephen Russell wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Nicholas Geti <ng...@optonline.net> wrote: >> http://tinyurl.com/2em2gae >> >> Congressmen are legally allowed to make money on insider trading.
> Do as I say not as I do. > > I can see how this would make their life harder today. With so many > different decisions about so many different things they could get > caught up in proving that they were not aware of a topic in a meeting > that they didn't attend. > > Not saying that they should be given a free run compared to the rest > of us. ;-> Hi Stephen, Well, if they were to use the money for a nice public charity, even for their own districts, that would be one thing. But I get the impression from the article that it went straight into their own pockets. We need a good homeless program around here. If that would fund it, I don't have a problem with making the money for it off of short sales. It is in a way in the national interest, since the whole country's homeless come here during the winter so they don't *freeze*to*death*. It was one of my campaign issues, but as I mentioned before, I finished dead last - 71 votes behind some guy who had felony convictions. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4be438df.1040...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
