Stephen Russell wrote: > I know it's a paper done by RedHat so I would question the true > configuration used for EACH db in the test. If both teams brought in > their tuned beast it would be unbiased. Using JDBC for connections is > probably the clear difference between the two camps but only M$ can > say why. > > They looked pretty close in the cheezzzzeeeee graph presented as well > as any real output from the performance software.
Remember when MS (and probably the other proprietary vendors like Oracle) used to threaten lawsuits if you did any non-vendor approved performance tests? Late 90s come to mind. -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4be8477d.3000...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
