Michael Oke, II wrote: > > Ricardo Aráoz wrote: >> Michael Oke, II wrote: >>> I'm going to simplify this as much as I can. >>> >>> Madigan was referring to the President ergo your comments were directed >>> towards that person. >> That is MadAgain, to whose comments I was referring to. Oke y >> > One day, maybe, you'll learn about being polite but I won't hold my breath.
Nnnnope! I might learn about being scared into politeness though. > There were people to be abducted in Guantanamo? Oh, you are talking > about the terrorists that were held there. Thought your cops called arrested people "suspects" and not "thieves", not until a judge pronounced them guilty. You mean to say that when the tag is "terrorist" then your constitution and your so called freedom goes to hell. All it takes is a suit to pronounce you "terrorist" and off you go to Guantanamo. I fail to see the difference between that and the military govt here making you "disappear". > Take that up with the U.S. > government as I, personally, had nothing to do with that. Well, you personally had nothing to do with Obama's auntie and yet you are very loudmouthed about that. > The CIA > operating in Italy? Again, that has what to do with questioning the > decisions of a President, sitting or otherwise? Maybe it has as much to do with it as people "disappearing" in my country. > >>> I don't believe that I ever said that anyone was treasonous for >>> questioning a President, either the current or previous. Understand >>> that? >> So you agree with me that whomever said that questioning Dubya was >> equivalent to treason and is now questioning Obama is, in his own eyes, >> either a traitor or a hypocrite. >> > Yup, I'd have to agree that you can't have it both ways. Either you are > allowed to question Dubya if you want to question Obama or you can't. > That, of course, would put hypocrites on both sides of the aisle at the > present time. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
